<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commenti a: Gwyneth Paltrow sulla cover di Elle UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.verycool.it/2009/02/03/gwyneth-paltrow-sulla-cover-di-elle-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.verycool.it/2009/02/03/gwyneth-paltrow-sulla-cover-di-elle-uk/</link>
	<description>Focus sulle tendenze nella Moda e nel Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Di: alessandra</title>
		<link>http://www.verycool.it/2009/02/03/gwyneth-paltrow-sulla-cover-di-elle-uk/#comment-580851</link>
		<dc:creator>alessandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verycool.it/?p=10411#comment-580851</guid>
		<description>io invece quoto in pieno il blog &#039;go fug yourself&#039;... in questa copertina la paltrow sta malissimo!
&quot;We just got an email about this cover from a reader, who noted that she&#039;s totally going to wear this into work tomorrow. Which is funny, because I wore my quasi-doublet and my shortie pantaloons YESTERDAY.  The thing is, I get that this is &quot;THE FASHION ISSUE&quot; and ergo the cover must be devoted, not to fashion or even Fashion, but to FASHION, which leads to....you know, boxer shorts-esque shortie short bloomers and a half-fantastic/half-inspired-by Mickey-Mouse-ears jacket that is one of those things where you&#039;re like, &quot;yes, I grasp the fabulousness while also recognizing that it&#039;s kind of ridiculous and literally no one, NO ONE could wear this for real ever and therefore it sort of has no point and is like the clothing version of a tree not making sound if it falls in the woods and there&#039;s no one to hear it,&quot; but my question is, if you&#039;re going to be putting someone in your Tree Falling In the Woods outfit, wouldn&#039;t you rather have, like, Linda Evangelista? At the very least, she could pose without losing her neck.&quot;
parole sante</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>io invece quoto in pieno il blog &#8216;go fug yourself&#8217;&#8230; in questa copertina la paltrow sta malissimo!<br />
&#8220;We just got an email about this cover from a reader, who noted that she&#8217;s totally going to wear this into work tomorrow. Which is funny, because I wore my quasi-doublet and my shortie pantaloons YESTERDAY.  The thing is, I get that this is &#8220;THE FASHION ISSUE&#8221; and ergo the cover must be devoted, not to fashion or even Fashion, but to FASHION, which leads to&#8230;.you know, boxer shorts-esque shortie short bloomers and a half-fantastic/half-inspired-by Mickey-Mouse-ears jacket that is one of those things where you&#8217;re like, &#8220;yes, I grasp the fabulousness while also recognizing that it&#8217;s kind of ridiculous and literally no one, NO ONE could wear this for real ever and therefore it sort of has no point and is like the clothing version of a tree not making sound if it falls in the woods and there&#8217;s no one to hear it,&#8221; but my question is, if you&#8217;re going to be putting someone in your Tree Falling In the Woods outfit, wouldn&#8217;t you rather have, like, Linda Evangelista? At the very least, she could pose without losing her neck.&#8221;<br />
parole sante</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

